I found this week’s reading to be very thought provoking. I
realized there was a balance between how much I would agree with one statement
but then challenge the following statement. For this post I’ve decided to explain
some quotes or phrases that stuck out to me. It was very difficult for me to narrow
it down to three quotes because I found about ten that I could have rambled on
about, but the following three are important nonetheless.
Quote 1 : “LGBT students need advocacy and
protection, not neutrality.” (pg. 84)
When I first read this, I stopped to
think about how I felt. The very first thing that popped into my head was the “Don’t
ask, don’t tell” slogan. I’m not sure why I thought of this, and to be quite
honest I’m not sure how to connect the two as of yet, but hopefully we can
discuss this further in class. Anyway, at first I felt like the word “protection”
implied that being a part of the LGBT community was dangerous and that if
anyone were to know this about you, that you needed to be afraid of their
retaliation. I also thought that without neutrality, the “issue” of LGBT
communities would be shoved down everyone’s throat, almost exploiting them.as I
continued to read the chapter, however, I realized that advocacy and
understanding are necessary for people who suffer this bias, in order to hinder
the negative responses they too often receive.
Quote 2 : “They simply follow the paths of
least resistance. They put one foot in front of the other…without critically
examining the journey.” (pg. 84)
This quote is referring to how
teachers deal with situations regarding LGBT youth. It is sad to see that
teachers try to take the easy way out when faced with such a controversial
issue, but it is also somewhat understandable; sort of a fight or flight
response. Teachers need to consider not only how a student will react to the
happenings within the classroom, but also what happens when they leave. Parents
and other administration keep a close eye on teachers, so they are forced to
tread carefully when reacting to a situation, be it positive or negative. When
it comes to the LGBT community, many teachers, unfortunately, do not have all
of the necessary tools to properly handle unsavory incidents, so they just
throw their hands up. Later on in the reading we come across of examples of how
teachers dealt with these situations differently. I appreciated how we could
see the difference between a positive “solution”, i.e. asking a child if they
knew what “gay” really meant and if it fit appropriately (and academically, for
that matter) into the conversation, as well as a plan that was faced with
opposition, like the boy being sent to the principal for telling a classmate
that he had two moms. It is apparent that there are effective ways to have “teachable
moments” with controversial topics, but the struggle is figuring out when those
moments occur and seizing them before it’s too late.
Quote 3 : “Even teachers who describe
themselves as social justice advocates fail to challenge homophobic or
transphobic language and images in many early childhood settings.” (pg. 86)
Again, I had mixed feelings after
reading this statement. My initial reaction was that children in early
childhood settings were too young to really grasp the concept of LGBT students
and that they would not be able to understand the teacher, should they attempt
to breech the topic. As I continued to read, however, I realized that an early
introduction to any topic is never really a bad thing, as long as the topic is
appropriate and relevant, of course- you wouldn’t try to teach a kindergartener
your stance on gun control laws necessarily. The topic of LGBT youth is relevant
though, as it is infiltrating classrooms, books, television shows, and public
spaces around the world.
Our job as teachers is to devise a plan in which a student of
any age can understand and appreciate – whether they personally agree or not –
the hardships endured by the youth (and adults for that matter) who live a
different lifestyle from their own.
“Like paths of resistance, the roads to safe spaces are made
by walking. What will be your next step?” (pg. 99)
I couldn't agree more with all your comments on each quote. I also had mixed feelings about early childhood grasping the concept of LGBT but like you said, after reading on, the early introduction doesn't hurt as long as the topic is relevant. Awesome post using the quotes!
ReplyDeleteHey! I really liked your post! I liked all the quotes that you picked. I feel that they each represent an important point made in the article. Additionally, I had mixed feelings about early childhood students getting to know about LGBT topics as well , but as I read more I feel that it would be fine as long as it goes and makes sense with what is going on. I just really liked your post!
ReplyDeleteHey Sarah! I really liked the way you set up this post. I also really liked how you put yourself and your thoughts into everything. You didn't just explain what the quote meant in relation to the text, you explained what it meant to you. And that's really important! I agree that as teachers, we need to be ready and comfortable with anything that comes our way, and we should be welcoming towards everyone; and this post really extenuates that idea! great job!
ReplyDeletehi Sarah! great job on your blog this week, you chose really good quotes and they were well described. I also had mixed feeling about LGBT topics being discussed early on, but after reading the article I am definitely ok with it!
ReplyDeleteHi Sarah! I loved hearing your thoughts on those quotes. This reading was very interesting. It made me think a lot about bullying and the whole LGBT. When I read quote one, I thought the same thing! Why do lesbians and gays need protection? Why can't they be treated like everyone else! I can't wait for this discussion in class to hear everyones thoughts!
ReplyDeleteI really appreciate how you made your ambivalence visible here -- talking through and around and beyond issues is the best way to figure out how you thin ad feel about them. Good work!
ReplyDelete